Absolutely. I also have some ideas that are more philosophical—or maybe even spiritual—that have to do with my faith in language as material. I’m interested in allowing as much of my unconscious to come through. I think my own consciousness is not so interesting and I don’t generally write to express myself. I write to find deep truths for myself and for other people and to make poems that feel like they’re connected with a deep, essential aspect of human experience. Even if the poems themselves are very specific or particular, somehow they’re connected to those forces. That’s what I’m looking for in poetry. I need to get out of myself, in a way. I believe in language and I want to subject myself to it. That’s why I like working with found text or just putting myself out into the world where other people are talking, listening to what they’re saying, walking by signs and looking at newspapers and things. Picking up on the glimpses of truth in language, then trying to work that into the poems.
Matthew Zapruder has not joined FLAPSS and has not endorsed it. This page is a reference record assembled from published interviews and public remarks. Every answer below is a direct quotation with the source and date shown next to it.
Matthew Zapruder
American poet
United States · b. 1967
Arts and letters
Poet Matthew Zapruder discusses perfecting his own generative processes for writing, the unfortunate ways in which most people are taught not to like poetry, and why being the lone poet at the party is actually a cool thing.
1 answer 0 followers reference
Every quotation above is reproduced from the source shown beside it and has not been edited. Matthew Zapruder did not write these answers for FLAPSS. Request a correction or removal.