Science for me is a language of peace and the only one I know which is absolutely international. I can talk to a UK scientist or any scientist worldwide about my research and they understand exactly what I am talking about. We may even find an area of mutual interest to collaborate on and together we can make an even greater impact on the world around us.
Originally asked
Peter Thiel, to job candidates, Zero to One, chapter 1, 2014
Peter Thiel, Zero to One, chapter 1, where it is introduced as his job-interview question. Thiel supplies his own standard: a good answer takes the form "most people believe x, but the truth is the opposite of x."
You answer as yourself. Nobody on FLAPSS answers as anybody else.
LW, Lindau Nobel Laureate Meetings source ↗
Others on this question
View all 43 →I understand my definition does not meet most people’s definition of disability.
Sometimes it just seems like the more women tell the truth, the less men want to hear it.
And I say, “Every single dollar that was spent on the space program, went into the pockets of the individuals who worked on it: the contractors, the subcontractors, the vendors. It went to feed their children, put clothes on their back, send them to school.…If we are going to be the leaders of the world, and we are going to worry about trade balance, if we are going to worry about military systems, or solving the problems of the environment, we are going to have to continue to spend money on research, medical research as well.
More from Ada Yonath
View profile →I like reading, I like swimming.I go snorkeling if I can. But not because I’m stuck, but because I enjoy them. And when I am swimming or whatever, I find I have more time to think.
It is possible to be a good scientist, a good mother and have a family and even bake a cake.
Today, in my opinion, people are more interested in the number of papers and the way of judging people has become much more statistical. Pupils are already doing this right from the beginning. Also, very few people go into basic science, there’s a big thing about making money e.g. biotech. Some people view education as a tool for making money or at least for making a good life, rather than understanding and digging down into something, which was my motivation.
I did not meet Franklin but admired her work and scientific attitude. I did meet Hodgkin and learned a lot from her.
Ultimately, my research was curiosity driven, which kept me active even in low periods.
Try to make better antibiotics. I’m not sure we can cure everything, that we can win the game against bacteria, but we can try to control it, to make the appearance of resistance more controllable. We can look for new antibiotics, not overuse antibiotics, not use antibiotics where they are not needed. If possible, if somebody has an idea for something completely new, I would love that.
More on values & belief
- Which living person do you most admire, and why? 426 answers
- What is the trait you most deplore in others? 210 answers
- What is something everyone in your world agrees about that you think is wrong? 91 answers
- What are you unwilling to optimise? 37 answers
- What have you come to understand about what it means to be human? 31 answers
- What do you need to believe in order to get through the day? 25 answers
Also answered this
Alan Shepard, Arthur Ashkin, Aaron Ciechanover, Ahmed Zewail, Ernst Mayr, Alexa Chung
Search the directory for somebody in particular.
Explore further
- All values & belief questions
- Explore the archive — by field, age, era, and subject